Concluded DOL Wage and Hour Division cases in which DOL found a violation. An investigation that found none won't show here, and neither will an open investigation, a private lawsuit, a state labor agency case, or an arbitration settlement. Covers the statute categories this site tracks (H-1B, general wage/hour, child labor, sub-minimum wage, H-2A, H-2B, Davis-Bacon, and migrant/seasonal farmworker protections), not every WHD program, and only cases matched under this exact employer name on file with WHD. No result here means no such case on file — it isn't the same as a clean record.
57 child labor (flsa), 51 minimum wage / overtime (flsa)
Cases by the year their findings ended, 2006–2024
This is the aggregate picture. Your personalized report adds the individual case-by-case detail, lawsuits and layoff notices on file — plus your own target salary range for any role.
Get your free personalized report →A listed finding is DOL's own concluded determination following an investigation, not an accusation or a lawsuit outcome, and appearing here isn't a claim of ongoing or systemic misconduct — each case reflects one specific investigated period. Matching is exact-name-only: a real violation under a spelling not on file for this employer's matched name won't be found, so a low count here means few matches under this name, not a confirmed clean record. Source: DOL Wage and Hour Division Enforcement Database, the compliance actions concluded since FY2005 that found a violation. Informational only, not legal advice.
A different signal from the enforcement record above: Search results for Chick-Fil-A in federal wage-and-hour court records (Fair Labor Standards Act claims only), from public PACER records via CourtListener: 22 cases turn up under this name. The search matches the name Chick-Fil-A anywhere in a case's record and leaves the defendant unchecked, so a listed case can name another company, a similarly named company, or Chick-Fil-A as the plaintiff. The defendant can be the company that runs a location, such as a franchise owner. Filing a lawsuit only means someone made a claim, and most never produce a public finding of who was right; this data has no outcome, settlement, or judgment field. A bigger number here mostly reflects a bigger company, not worse conduct, so don't read it as a guilt score. Check the real docket before drawing a conclusion. We're overdue to check for anything newer; this is current as of our last look, not necessarily today.
Your personalized report lists the real, linked cases — case name, court, and filing date for each.
Get your free personalized report →View layoff notices for this employer, with the states and dates
Chick-Fil-A has 3 WARN layoff notices on file from the last 24 months, covering 206 workers; the most recent is dated June 2026 in CA. WARN notices are the advance filings that employers with 100 or more employees send to state workforce agencies before a layoff or closure, taken from the open WARN Notice Register. Our copy holds records first added on or before November 14, 2026; the date records additions to our copy. Bigger employers file more notices, so a larger count tracks company size. A listing that repeats an earlier one is counted once, and a notice the register labels as amended or withdrawn is left out. How to read layoff notice data: what the notices can and cannot say, and why some are missing.
Your personalized report lists each notice — site, headcount, date, and a link to the state's own filing.
Get your free personalized report →Wage data: U.S. Department of Labor OFLC LCA Disclosure Data and U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics OEWS. LCA filings reflect sponsored-worker wage offers, which skew toward mid-large employers and specific occupations — treat any estimate built from a small sample cautiously. Informational only; not legal, immigration, or financial advice.